Technological innovation has driven human progress for hundreds of years, with the pace of advancement continuously increasing. In the last two centuries we’ve gone from steam-powered machines and the industrial revolution to the internet and the information age, with the worldwide web now connecting nearly every corner of the globe.
Thanks to this period of rapid technological advancement, our workplaces have evolved virtually beyond all recognition in the last century alone. How and where we work is now vastly different – and so are the tools we use to communicate with our colleagues.
First, computers transformed the workplace and the way we worked. Then, the internet took things a step further, enabling real-time collaboration between workers in every corner of the world. Today, smartphones and 4G LTE mean that we can work from anywhere, at any time, in what has become known as the always-on economy.
Naturally, these advancements have created some challenges for effective communication. Workplaces have become more dispersed, for example, leading to the development of real-time collaboration tools that help teams work better together.
It all started with a memo
However, as letters weren’t the most efficient method of communication, memos became commonplace in the workplace by the 1920s. Memo is a shorter form of the word memorandum, whose Latin origin translates to ‘something to be noted’ or ‘something to be brought to mind.’ This means they were shorter and more informal than letters, and the use of jargon was acceptable – making them ideal for internal use. They were used to create a “paper trail” for future reference, primarily for actions such as requesting specific information from colleagues, responding to previous questions, sharing new information, or providing instructions.
Memos were typically written and sealed into "routing envelopes" to be picked up, processed, sorted, and delivered by mailroom clerks and postmasters – signifying an era of direct instruction, rather than casual dialogue.
Despite all their benefits, the limitations of memos soon became clear. For example, they were rarely used to deliver positive, uplifting information, and were largely associated with passive-aggressive office rants. More importantly, memos were still a slow means of communication and required businesses to operate mailrooms at every office.
No comments:
Post a Comment